Book Review - Rev. of Tainted Witness: Why We Doubt What Women Say About Their Lives
Date
Authors
Kennedy, Rosanne
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Taylor & Francis (Routledge)
Abstract
In Tainted Witness: Why We Doubt What Women Say About Their Lives,
Leigh Gilmore extends her commanding knowledge of testimony, trauma,
and women’s life narrative in vital new directions that have a broad public as
well as scholarly appeal and applicability. With its perceptive tracking of how
women’s testimony circulates and is received in the public sphere, Tainted
Witness is perfectly timed to provide essential guidance for making sense
both of women’s testimonies of sexual harm and responses to them in an era
of #MeToo. The central premise of the book is that “judgment falls unequally
on women who bear witness” and that women’s testimony is “deformed by
doubt.” In this regard, Tainted Witness can be read productively alongside
Mary Beard’s Women and Power, which traces the discrediting of women’s
speech to Ancient Greece and Rome. Rejecting the conventional association
of women with lying, Gilmore persuasively argues that “a tainted witness is
not who someone is but who someone can become in the process of bringing
an account into the public sphere” (44), particularly when the witness is typically not in control of the forum of judgment and is unable to provide relevant context.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Auto/Biography Studies
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
2037-12-31