Novel statistical approaches to identify risk factors for soil-transmitted helminth infection in Timor-Leste

dc.contributor.authorAw, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorClarke, Naomi
dc.contributor.authorMayfield, Helen
dc.contributor.authorLau, Colleen
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, Alice
dc.contributor.authorNery, Susana
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-21T02:11:43Z
dc.date.available2023-08-21T02:11:43Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.updated2022-07-24T08:19:09Z
dc.description.abstractSoil-transmitted helminths (STHs) are parasitic intestinal worms that infect almost a fifth of the global population. Sustainable control of STHs requires understanding the complex interaction of factors contributing to transmission. Identifying risk factors has mainly relied on logistic regression models where the underlying assumption of independence between variables is not always satisfied. Previously demonstrated risk factors including water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) access and behaviours, and socioeconomic status are intrinsically linked. Similarly, environmental factors including climate, soil and land attributes are often strongly correlated. Alternative methods such as recursive partitioning and Bayesian networks can handle correlated variables, but there are no published studies comparing these methods with logistic regression in the context of STH risk factor analysis. Baseline cross-sectional data from school-aged children in the (S)WASH-D for Worms study were used to compare risk factors identified from modelling the same data using three different statistical techniques. Outcomes of interest were infection with Ascaris spp. and any hookworm species (Necator americanus, Ancylostoma duodenale, and Ancylostoma ceylanicum). Mixed-effects logistic regression identified the fewest risk factors. Recursive partitioning identified the most WASH and demographic risk factors, while Bayesian networks identified the most environmental risk factors. Recursive partitioning produced classification trees that visualised potentially at-risk population sub-groups. Bayesian networks helped visualise relationships between variables and enabled interactive modelling of outcomes based on different scenarios for the predictor variables of interest. Model performance was similar across all techniques. Risk factors identified across all techniques were vegetation for Ascaris spp., and cleaning oneself with water after defecating for hookworm. This study adds to the limited body of evidence exploring alternative data modelling approaches in identifying risk factors for STH infections. Our findings suggest these approaches can provide novel insights for more robust interpretation.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipPrimary data collection that preceded this analysis was funded by a Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Grand Challenges Explorations Grant, USA (OPP1119041), awarded to SVN https://www.- gatesfoundation.org/en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn0020-7519en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/296684
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceThis is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_AU
dc.publisherElsevieren_AU
dc.rights© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Australian Society for Parasitologyen_AU
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution Licenseen_AU
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_AU
dc.sourceInternational Journal for Parasitologyen_AU
dc.subjectSoil-transmitted helminthsen_AU
dc.subjectWateren_AU
dc.subjectSanitation and hygieneen_AU
dc.subjectRisk factorsen_AU
dc.subjectLogistic regressionen_AU
dc.subjectRecursive partitioningen_AU
dc.subjectBayesian networksen_AU
dc.titleNovel statistical approaches to identify risk factors for soil-transmitted helminth infection in Timor-Lesteen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue9en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage739en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage729en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationAw, Jessica, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationClarke, Naomi, College of Health and Medicine, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationMayfield, Helen, College of Health and Medicine, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationLau, Colleen, College of Health and Medicine, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationRichardson, Alice, RSCH Research & Innovation Portfolio, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationNery, Susana, University of New South Walesen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidAw, Jessica, u6280770en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidClarke, Naomi, u5751452en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidMayfield, Helen, u1028048en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidLau, Colleen, u5651486en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidRichardson, Alice, u3767151en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor420204 - Epidemiological methodsen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB20986en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume51en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijpara.2021.01.005en_AU
local.identifier.thomsonIDWOS:000684973600004
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.elsevier.com/en-auen_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S0020751921001168-main.pdf
Size:
2.37 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: