Measuring distortions to agricultural incentives, revisited

dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Kymen_AU
dc.contributor.authorKurzweil, Marianneen_AU
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Willen_AU
dc.contributor.authorSandri, Damianoen_AU
dc.contributor.authorValenzuela, Ernestoen_AU
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-04T00:36:06Z
dc.date.available2016-07-04T00:36:06Z
dc.date.issued2008-10
dc.description.abstractNotwithstanding the tariffication component of the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture, import tariffs on farm products continue to provide an incomplete indication of the extent to which agricultural producer and consumer incentives are distorted in national markets. As well, in developing countries especially, non-agricultural policies indirectly impact on agricultural and food markets. Empirical analysis aimed at monitoring distortions to agricultural incentives thus need to examine both agricultural and non-agricultural policy measures including import or export taxes, subsidies, and quantitative restrictions plus domestic taxes or subsidies on farm outputs or inputs and consumer subsidies for food staples. This paper addresses the practical methodological issues that need to be faced when attempting to undertake such a measurement task in developing countries. The approach is illustrated in two ways: by presenting estimates of nominal and relative rates of assistance to farmers in China for the period 1981–2005; and by summarizing estimates from an economy-wide CGE model of the effects on agricultural versus non-agricultural markets of the project's measured distortions globally as of 2004.en_AU
dc.format31 pagesen_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1474-7456en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/105509
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_AU
dc.rights© Anderson, Kurzweil, Martin, Sandri, and Valenzuela, Cambridge University Press 2008en_AU
dc.sourceWorld Trade Reviewen_AU
dc.subjectUruguayen_AU
dc.subjectRounden_AU
dc.subjectAgreementen_AU
dc.subjectAgricultureen_AU
dc.subjecttariffsen_AU
dc.subjectimporten_AU
dc.subjectfarmen_AU
dc.subjectproductsen_AU
dc.subjectnationalen_AU
dc.subjectmarketsen_AU
dc.subjectfooden_AU
dc.subjectdevelopingen_AU
dc.subjectcountriesen_AU
dc.subjectproduceren_AU
dc.subjectconsumeren_AU
dc.subjectnon-agriculturalen_AU
dc.subjectpoliciesen_AU
dc.titleMeasuring distortions to agricultural incentives, revisiteden_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue4en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage704en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage675en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationAnderson, Kym, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics, CAP Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.authoremailkym.anderson@anu.edu.auen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidu4042848en_AU
local.description.notesThis draws on an earlier paper presented by Anderson at the Summer Symposium of the International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium (IATRC), Gustav-Stresemann-Institut (GSI), Bonn, Germany, 28–30 May 2006. At the time of publication Kym Anderson was affiliated with the School of Economics, University of Adelaide, Australia.en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume7en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1017/S1474745608004011en_AU
local.identifier.essn1475-3138en_AU
local.identifier.uidSubmittedByu4579722en_AU
local.publisher.urlhttp://www.cambridge.org/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
884 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: