Social identity and charismatic leadership attribution : why do they think he's fabulous when we know he's not?
Date
2007
Authors
Verhagen, Alan
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
If charisma is a personal force, or a set of specific behaviours, used by the
leader to recruit and influence followers, why have all the great charismatic leaders
been embraced by some and reviled by others? Weber (1947; 1961) conceived the
charismatic leader as one perceived to possess transcendent powers which set him or
her apart from others. New leadership theories (e.g., Bass, 1985; Conger & Kanungo,
1987; Shamir, House, & Arthur, 1993) have sought to catalogue these qualities and
their effects on followers. However, neither of these schools of thought have clearly
explained why polarised responses to charismatic leaders occur.
An initial study explored the similarities and differences in the way two
renown charismatic leaders--{lne adored, the other reviled-were perceived. Taking
a follower perspective, this thesis used a social identity analysis (Tajfel & Turner,
1986; Turner, 1987) to focus on the variation in the attribution of charismatic leader behaviours to the same target leader. Over four studies this variance was repeatedly shown to be associated with the level of a perceived shared social identity. Indeed, varying the content of the social identity varied the level of charismatic attribution; while reducing information about the leader's social identity reduced that association.
Three other major effects of the social identification process on the charismatic attribution process were explored. First, follower outcomes commonly theorised to be the result of charismatic leadership behaviours, were shown to be
strongly associated with social identity. Second, social liking for the leader was
shown to fully or partially mediate the effects of social identity on the attribution of charismatic leadership and on follower outcomes. Third, attributions about
supporters and detractors of the charismatic leader were investigated. It was found that those who shared a social identity with the leader viewed support for that leader
as normal and positive, whereas they pathologised the responses of those who
rejected the leader. Conversely, those who did not share a social identity with the
leader viewed rejection of that leader as normal and positive, while pathologising
follower support. It was concluded that, rather than being a mysterious personal process, charisma is firmly rooted in normal social identification processes because
leadership and followership operate largely within a social context. Social identity
affects the way we perceive the leader and evaluate his or her leadership behaviours.
Rather than recognising the powerful influence of social identity on us or others, we tend to make the fundamental error of attributing our responses to "charismatic"
leadership.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Type
Thesis (PhD)
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description
Whole Thesis