Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Anger and repression : a test of a model

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Hall, Carol

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Anger or more specifically, repression, suppression or difficulties in coping with anger has achieved prominence in the literature of psychological medicine, as contributing or etiological factors in hypertension, coronary heart disease and cancer. In past studies, 'repression', operationally defined by a pattern of high defensiveness and low trait anxiety, has been linked consistently with elevated physiological arousal during stressful laboratory tasks, despite low self-reported disturbance. This model for operationalizing repression has also been used in studies which demonstrate that repression is associated with restricted access to memories from childhood and that this is particularly so for negative emotional experiences. The current research was designed to extend the previously mentioned model of repression to anger, to test whether similar effects to those noted in research into repression of anxiety also exist in anger repression. Defensiveness and trait anger were used to operationalize repression of anger and five groups of subjects participated in free-recall of angry, anxious and happy experiences from childhood. Heart rate, skin conductance level and facial skin temperature were monitored throughout baseline and recall, and subjective involvement during recall was assessed. Mixed-sex samples comprised eight 'repressors of anger', 10 'true-low angry' and 10 'true-high angry' subjects, eight traditionally-defined 'repressors of anxiety', and six individuals who repressed both emotions; the latter two groups being included to permit comparison of repressors of anger with repressors of anxiety and to allow for evaluation of possible additivity of effects in repression. Results revealed no group differences in physiological, subjective arousal, or access to affective memories. Explanations for the absence of effects similar to those in repression of anxiety were sought, both in terms of methodology and conceptual issues examining differences between the emotions of anger and anxiety. The latter suggested that repression of these emotions may not operate in a similar manner.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

Downloads

File
Description