Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Pharmaceuticals, Intellectual Property and Free Trade: The Case of the US-Australia Free Trade Agreement

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Drahos, Peter
Lokuge, Buddhima
Goddard, Martyn
Henry, David A
Faunce, Thomas

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Carfax Publishing, Taylor & Francis Group

Abstract

Australia did poorly in several key areas of the recently completed free trade agreement with the US. It failed to insulate the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) from significant change, and conceded to increased intellectual property standards. The PBS, as a system of effective bargaining with multinational pharmaceutical firms, has been deeply compromised and higher drug prices can be expected over time. The intellectual property chapter strengthens the position of patent owners and undermines the evolution of a competitive generics industry. These developments are part of a broader and internationally coordinated strategy being pursued by pharmaceutical multinationals to globalize and strengthen patent rights and monopoly profits.

Description

Citation

Source

Prometheus

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until