Restorative Justice: Lessons from Libya

dc.contributor.authorBraithwaite, John
dc.contributor.authorRashed, Tamim
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-07T22:38:48Z
dc.date.available2015-12-07T22:38:48Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.date.updated2020-11-08T07:24:49Z
dc.description.abstractA failed restorative justice in Libya is described. Shooting breaks out in a reconciliation meeting. The shooting spirals into a �small town war� (van Klinken, 2007). The State�s inability to ensure security for the reconciliation, and to stand behind enforcement of the agreement, was a problem. The first lesson in the logic of deterrence from the case is that where deterrence is most needed, it is most dangerous. Secondly, the logic of restorative justice is that where it is hardest to do, it is most important to do. In places like Libya, traditional tribal justice informed by evidence based restorative justice is imperative for smothering sparks that might reignite civil war. It is also important in transitional zones beyond state authority for controlling transnational crime and terrorism.
dc.identifier.issn2050-4721
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/23587
dc.publisherHart Publishing
dc.sourceRestorative Justice
dc.titleRestorative Justice: Lessons from Libya
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage8
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1
local.contributor.affiliationBraithwaite, John, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationRashed, Tamim, not applicable
local.contributor.authoruidBraithwaite, John, u8402911
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor180199 - Law not elsewhere classified
local.identifier.ariespublicationu5734898xPUB27
local.identifier.citationvolumeSpecial report
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads