Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

The effect of competitor presence and relative competitive ability on male mate choice

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Mautz, Brian
Jennions, Michael

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that males might respond in an adaptive manner to an elevated likelihood of male-male competition for mates by facultatively altering their mating preferences. Little is known, however, about how male choice is influenced by a male's relative competitiveness or by the risk posed by increased physical competition for access to mates compared with greater risk of sperm competition. We investigated how the relative size and presence of a competitor influences male choice using 2-choice experiments in the mosquito fish, Gambusia holbrooki. We varied the size of the focal male, the size of a competitor, and whether the competitor remained alongside the preferred female (physical and sperm competition) or was removed (only greater sperm competition). Prior to viewing a competitor, males, regardless of size, significantly preferred larger females. After a male had viewed a competitor alongside his preferred female, however, he subsequently spent significantly less time associating with her. This change in male choice was not influenced by focal male size, competitor size, or whether or not the competitor was physically present during the choice trial. After viewing a competitor, however, larger males spent significantly more time than did smaller males near their preferred female. Our results suggest that male mating preferences are sensitive to the risk of increased physical or indirect sperm competition, but there was no evidence that males adjust their mate choice in response to the relative size (and therefore presumed competitiveness) of rivals.

Description

Citation

Source

Behavioral Ecology

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2037-12-31