Economic voting and the Great Recession in Europe: a comparative study of twenty-five countries
Abstract
The Great Recession of 2007--09 was the worst global economic
crisis since the
Great Depression of the 1930s. The effects were felt across most
of the
developed world and Europe was no exception. In many European
countries,
austerity programmes were implemented in response to the
recession, which were
often deeply unpopular. Many governments lost power in the years
following the
recession, with sometimes strikingly harsh swings against them.
One notable
example was the Irish election of 2011, in which the incumbent
Fianna Fáil was
reduced from 71 to 20 seats, by far its worst result at any
general election
since independence in 1922. This is congruent with the theory of
economic
voting, according to which voters will remove from office
governments that fail
to deliver economic prosperity. Although there is an enormous
empirical
literature supporting this theory, almost all of this evidence
pertains to the
typical boom and bust cycle of individual countries and little is
known about
economic voting during a severe global recession. The Irish
result could have
been indicative of the usual economic vote, a bolstered economic
vote due to
the unusual scale and severity of the crisis, or of
dissatisfaction with the
government's handling of the crisis. This thesis investigates
whether the usual
economic vote in European countries was altered during the Great
Recession.
This thesis uses survey data from the 2004, 2009 and 2014 waves
of the European
Election Studies~(EES) to compare the economic vote in 25
European countries
before, during and after the Great Recession. Multilevel methods
are used to
model voters' support for the parties they could vote for at
general elections
in their own countries. Using this method, the results show that
the economic
vote was weaker during the crisis than it was either before or
after. In order
to explain these results, I analyse which parties voters tended
to prefer after
the crisis and how attitudes towards the European Union evolved
over time. The
results find that there was a shift away from centrist and
pro-European parties
towards radical and Eurosceptic parties following the crisis. In
addition,
support for the EU fell over the same time period and voters were
increasingly
likely to hold the EU responsible for economic conditions. Given
the timing of
these shifts as well as the association between European
institutions and
austerity policies, these findings suggest that the austerity
programmes
implemented in the wake of the crisis may have been a stronger
catalyst for
economic voting in Europe than the Great Recession itself.
Description
Citation
Collections
Source
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description