Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

A comparison of Australian and European Union research performance profiles

dc.contributor.authorMatthews, Mark
dc.contributor.authorBiglia, Beverley
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Bruce
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-21T05:23:29Z
dc.date.available2013-08-21T05:23:29Z
dc.date.issued2009-11-20
dc.description.abstract"Governments worldwide face the challenge of how best to prioritise their international science and innovation (S&I) cooperation activities. This involves balancing the intrinsic benefits that may arise from international S&I cooperation with extrinsic considerations – diplomacy, trade, national security etc. The interplay of these intrinsic and extrinsic considerations means that complex and often ambiguous tradeoffs need to be addressed by policymakers. In some cases international S&I cooperation priorities will reflect extrinsic diplomatic and geopolitical goals. In other cases the objectives will relate more closely to balancing the costs, risks and benefits of particular bilateral and multilateral S&I cooperation opportunities. Given the limited financial resources available to support international S&I cooperation it is useful for policymakers to have access to appropriate decision-support tools and information. This should help to avoid wasteful resource allocations caused by a lack of access to relevant information.This paper seeks to contribute to the evolving policy framework in this area by considering ways of characterising and mapping international imbalances in research performance." - page 2en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipAustralian National Universityen_AU
dc.format8 pagesen_AU
dc.identifier.citationMatthews, M., Biglia, B. & Murphy, B. (2009). A comparison of Australian and European Union research performance profiles. FEAST Discussion Paper 2/09. Canberra, ACT: Forum for European-Australian Science and Technology cooperation (FEAST)en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/10345
dc.publisherForum for European-Australian Science and Technology cooperation (FEAST)en_AU
dc.rightsAuthotr/s retain copyrighten_AU
dc.titleA comparison of Australian and European Union research performance profilesen_AU
dc.typeWorking/Technical Paperen_AU
dcterms.abstractOpen Accessen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBiglia, Bev, ANU, Research Evaluation and Policy Project
local.contributor.affiliationMurphy, Bruce, Australian Government Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research, International Strategy and Europe Section
local.contributor.affiliationMatthews, Mark, ANU, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National Institute for Public Policy, Strategy (Executive Director)
local.description.notesAn extensive Technical Annex is available upon request containing detailed data on a research field by research field basis. The FEAST Project was hosted by the ANU. It operated from 2001-2012.en_AU
local.type.statusPublished versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Matthews_ComparisonAustralian2009.pdf
Size:
1.65 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
abcd