Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Arms control and disarmament : negotiations in the United Nations

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Kamal, Nazir

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Arms control and disarmament issues figured prominently in the UN in the late 1970s and early 1980s, along with other regional and international security issues. This occurred in the wake of the General Assembly’s first special session on disarmament in mid-1978, which was also attended by numerous non-governmental organisations involved in related issues. The special session was held largely at the non-aligned group’s urging and also because of general concern that the United Nations had not focused on disarmament issues since the late 1950s. The non-aligned states sought to reduce the dominance of the superpowers by promoting a greater role for the UN in maintaining international security and in influencing the pace and pattern of global arms control. The multilateral diplomacy that ensued however proved quite unproductive and deepened the sense of crisis regarding the UN’s future. The distinctive approach of the non-aligned states compounded the problem posed by the lack of progress in arms control in US-Soviet relations. The superpowers displayed little enthusiasm for any significant multilateral control, either over military competition or over armed conflicts between states. The Soviet Union seemed to be even less interested than the United States. The numerical majority of the non-aligned group in the UN probably reinforced the superpowers’ preference for the existing bilateral structure for dealing with international security issues. In any case, the imbroglio in multilateral diplomacy and obstacles in bilateral relations between the superpowers indicated that there were serious difficulties in the way of any significant arms control progress and that its prospects would remain limited, especially in the absence of progress in pursuit of other international security goals.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

Downloads