Open Research will be updating the system on Tuesday, 14 July 2026, from 8:15 to 9:00 AM. We apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Utility of the Wender-Utah rating scale and the checklists for the diagnosis of familial attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults. Convergent and concurrent validities [Utilidad de la escala Wender-Utah y de las escalas de sntomas para el diagn

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Pineda, David A.
Trujillo-Orrego, Natalia
Aguirre-Acevedo, D. C.
Arango, Clara P.
Hincapié-Henao, Liliana
Montoya-Arenas, David A.
Lopera, Francisco
Pineda-Álvarez, Daniel E.
Arcos-Burgos, Mauricio
Muenke, Maximilian

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Viguera Editores

Abstract

Introduction. Standard questionnaires to characterize familial attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) of adults have been studied in some studies. Aim. To observe convergent and concurrent validity of four standard rating scales to quantify the familial ADHD symptoms of adults. Patients and methods. The sample was constituted by the 392 adults; aged 18 through 84 years, belonging to 141 Antioquian families with multiple ADHD affected members, who fulfilled by self-report the Wender-Utah Rating Scale and the ADHD checklist; and, beside, answered a questionnaire asking for current and past ADHD symptoms, in a neurological interview. Correlation analyses were done. Sensitivity and specificity for ADHD diagnosis were also determined. Results. Significant and over 0.6 correlations were observed between scales that explored past ADHD symptoms. Distant cut-off points for 90% sensitivity and specificity were observed for all questionnaires. The best LR+ (12.15) was found for the report of 5 or more past hyperactivity-impulsivity symptoms; follow by the report of 7 or more past ADHD symptoms (6.92). Conclusions. Cut-off points should be taken with caution when these rating scales were used for adult ADHD screening. Psychometric properties do not allow using these scales as substitution of structured clinical interview for the gold standard ADHD diagnosis in adults.

Description

Citation

Source

Revista de Neurologia

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2037-12-31
abcd