Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Of fractal and Fourier: A measure for local shape complexity for neurological applications

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Walsh, Erin
Zhang, Tianqi
Cherbuin, Nicolas

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier

Abstract

Background Local shape complexity can be biologically meaningful as a marker of disease, trauma, or change in brain structure over time. Fractal dimensionality (FD) is currently the dominant measure of local shape complexity used in neuroimaging but its limitations are not well understood. New method Elliptical Fourier harmonic power requirement (HPR) may provide complementary information to FD. We benchmarked the performance of FD and HPR on a series of simulated shapes, systematically manipulating aspects of local shape complexity, and a series of clinical contours (glioma tumour cores and stroke lesions from the BRATS and ATLAS datasets). HPR was calculated as the point of 99.9% harmonic power. FD was calculated at six resolutions (8 × 8, 16 × 16, 32 × 32, 64 × 64, 128 × 128, and 256 × 256), by using an approach which computationally indexes the complexity of the shape boundary (i.e. the number of cells defining the contour) relative to the total grid size. Results and comparison with existing methods PR and FD were moderately positively correlated (r ≈ 0.2 to 0.8 depending on shape properties), and both were sensitive to the frequency and amplitude of local complexity. FD was most biased by rotation, while HPR was more biased by global shape features such as deep invaginations. FD indicated an aggregate measure of complexity across the whole contour, while HPR indicated the point of highest complexity. Conclusions The HPR index provides conceptually distinct local complexity information from the current FD standard. Future research will benefit from using these complementary measures.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License

Restricted until