Is a village a village if no one lives there? Negotiated histories on Mabuyag in the Western Torres Strait

dc.contributor.authorWright, Duncanen_AU
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-08T22:42:14Zen_AU
dc.date.issued2011
dc.date.updated2015-12-08T10:34:27Z
dc.description.abstractPartnership (or community) archaeology has become increasingly prominent in the Australia/ Pacific region (see Marshall 2002 and McNiven and Russell 2005). A community-led approach acknowledges the importance of indigenous control of the cultural-heritage process. This is designed to enable indigenous communities to ‘maintain or establish community pride, cohesion and identity’, as well as creating a ‘more nuanced and textured view of the past’ (Smith 1999; Nicholas 2000; McNiven and Russell 2005:244; Smith and Wobst 2005). Divergent ‘symbolic and metaphoric strategies’ in oral history and archaeology are likely to result in the creation of different histories (McNiven and Russell 2005:248). This may be further influenced by methodological constraints (e.g. the validity, accuracy and representativeness of oral/archaeological histories) or the reluctance of communities to divulge secrets about their sites and practices (Sand 2000:68; McNiven and Russell 2005:48). When archaeological and ethnographic results do not correspond it is important to avoid both selective criticism of oral histories and censoring of instances where archaeology conflicts with oral accounts (Allen 1983:8; Echo-Hawk 1997; McNiven and Russell 2005:256). Partnership archaeology recognises that the cultural-heritage process requires ongoing negotiation between indigenous and archaeological communities, and in some cases the alteration of existing indigenous and/or non-indigenous cosmologies and methodologies (Nicholas 2000; McNiven and Russell 2005:248; Smith and Wobst 2005). In 2001, a community project was initiated in the western Torres Strait to track ‘archaeological signatures of ethnographically documented cultural practices back from a recent to a more distant past’ (David and McNiven 2004:203). As well as providing significant information on key points of cultural change, it has also provided a case study about community-based archaeology and the methods used to explore prehistoric sites and cultural material (e.g. McNiven and Feldman 2003; David et al. 2004; McNiven et al. 2009). This paper stems from doctoral research conducted during the Western Torres Strait cultural history project. It negotiates the competing histories for two ethnographically prominent ‘villages’, Wagadagam and Maidh, on Mabuyag in the central western Torres Strait.en_AU
dc.format.extent12 pagesen_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-92186-248-9en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/37002
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherANU ePress
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTerra Australis ; 35en_AU
dc.rightsAuthor/s retain copyrighten_AU
dc.sourcePacific Island Heritage: Archaeology, identity and community (Terra Australis 35)en_AU
dc.titleIs a village a village if no one lives there? Negotiated histories on Mabuyag in the Western Torres Straiten_AU
dc.typeBook chapteren_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access via publisher websiteen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage126en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.placeofpublicationCanberra, ACT, Australiaen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage115en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationWright, Duncan, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidWright, Duncan, u3335066en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.description.refereedYesen_AU
local.identifier.absfor210104 - Archaeology of Australia (excl. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander)en_AU
local.identifier.absseo970121 - Expanding Knowledge in History and Archaeology
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4486421xPUB143en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.22459/TA35.11.2011.10en_AU
local.publisher.urlhttp://press.anu.edu.au/en_AU
local.type.statusMetadata onlyen_AU

Downloads