Potential environmental and population health impacts of local urban food systems under climate change: a life cycle analysis case study of lettuce and chicken

dc.contributor.authorHall, Gillian
dc.contributor.authorRothwell, Alison
dc.contributor.authorGrant, Tim
dc.contributor.authorIsaacs, Bronwyn
dc.contributor.authorFord, Laura
dc.contributor.authorDixon, Jane
dc.contributor.authorFriel, Sharon
dc.contributor.authorKirk, Martyn
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-26T02:19:59Z
dc.date.available2014-05-26T02:19:59Z
dc.date.issued2014-03-26
dc.date.updated2015-12-08T03:23:24Z
dc.description.abstractBackground: Climate change is expected to have an impact on food production, processing and transport systems. While food systems have become globalized in recent decades, interest has re-emerged for local production and consumption to contribute to sustainable and secure food systems in an era of increasing urbanization and climate change. To explore environmental health issues related to the production of local food in an urban setting, a life cycle analysis screening study of two food commodities, chicken meat and lettuce, produced at industrial and civic scales was conducted in Sydney, Australia, as well as interviews with consumers and producers to explore their potential motivation to change. Methods: Determination of environmental impacts was performed using life cycle assessment (LCA) of two civic and one industrial scale producer for each commodity using SimaPro version 7.3.3. Impacts of global warming potential (GWP), land use and water use from the production of these commodities are reported. With a view to producing holistic insights to sustainable practices in Sydney, interviews with producers and consumers were undertaken to assess sociocultural outcomes including views on environmental food sustainability and other motivators of behavioral change. Results: Local industrial production of chicken meat was found to have a lower carbon footprint than small scale civic production. Small scale civic production of lettuce had a similar carbon footprint to local industrial production. Other environmental health benefits and risks varied across the production scales. Environmental sustainability was not generally a key concern of producers or consumers. Conclusions: Action can be taken to retain and promote food production in urban settings as a future means of assisting food security. The scale of production can be an important variable in assessing the environmental health impacts of food production in an urban setting. Currently neither producers nor consumers appear motivated to change practices to promote environmental sustainability.
dc.format13 pages
dc.identifier.issn2048-7010
dc.identifier.other2048-7010
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/11714
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/ft0991462
dc.rights© 2014 Hall et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. From publisher's PDF
dc.sourceAgriculture and Food Security 3.6(2014)
dc.subjecturbanization
dc.subjectscale of food production
dc.subjectcarbon footprint
dc.subjectlife cycle assessment
dc.titlePotential environmental and population health impacts of local urban food systems under climate change: a life cycle analysis case study of lettuce and chicken
dc.typeJournal article
dcterms.dateAccepted2014-03-03
local.bibliographicCitation.issue6
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage13
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1
local.contributor.affiliationFriel, Sharon, ANU National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health
local.contributor.affiliationHall, Gillian, ANU National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health
local.contributor.affiliationIsaacs, Bronwyn, ANU National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health
local.contributor.affiliationFord, Laura, ANU National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health
local.contributor.affiliationDixon, Jane, ANU National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health
local.contributor.affiliationKirk, Martyn, ANU National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health
local.contributor.authoruidu4162881en_AU
local.description.notesThis research received support from the Climate and Health Cluster, which is funded by the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Flagship Collaboration Fund.en_AU
local.identifier.absfor111799 - Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified
local.identifier.ariespublicationu5427758xPUB28
local.identifier.citationvolume3
local.identifier.doi10.1186/2048-7010-3-6
local.publisher.urlhttp://www.biomedcentral.com/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Friel_PotentialEnvironmental_2014.pdf
Size:
1.48 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format