Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Intervention trial to assess arsenic exposure from food crops in Bangladesh

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Ranmuthugala, Geethanjali
Milton, Abdul
Smith, Wayne T
Ng, Jack C
Sim, Malcolm R
Dear, Keith
Caldwell, Bruce

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Heldref Publications

Abstract

The authors assessed the contribution of food irrigated with arsenic-contaminated water to human exposure to arsenic in Bangladesh. An intervention trial was conducted in a village in the Jessore District of Bangladesh, where irrigation water had been field-tested in March 2000 and was found to contain arsenic with concentrations ranging from 100 to 500 μg/l. In May 2000, a random sample of 63 households was selected from the village, and 1 eligible person from each household was recruited to the study and randomized to an intervention or control group. The intervention group received food purchased from a village where irrigation water was found to contain <10 μg/l arsenic. The control group received food purchased from markets in the study village, where irrigation water was found to contain >100 μg/l arsenic. Pre- and postintervention urine samples were collected for urinary arsenic speciation assays. Preintervention, the mean urinary total arsenic concentrations were 139.25 μg/l and 129.15 μg/l for the intervention and control groups, respectively. These concentrations did not change significantly following intervention. Arsenic concentrations in samples of selected raw and cooked foods from the low-contamination area did not contain less arsenic than samples from the high-contamination area. Further studies to investigate the arsenic content of food grown in areas with high and low arsenic contamination of irrigation water are recommended.

Description

Citation

Source

Archives of Environmental and Occupational Health: an international journal

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

abcd