Within- Occasion Intraindividual Variability and Preclinical Diagnostic Status: Is Intraindividual Variability an Indicator of Mild Cognitive Impairment?

dc.contributor.authorChristensen, Helen
dc.contributor.authorDear, Keith
dc.contributor.authorParslow, Ruth
dc.contributor.authorSachdev, Perminder Singh
dc.contributor.authorJorm, Anthony F
dc.contributor.authorAnstey, Kaarin
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-13T22:53:36Z
dc.date.available2015-12-13T22:53:36Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.date.updated2015-12-11T10:57:32Z
dc.description.abstractIntraindividual variability in cognitive test performance has the potential to be a good marker of preclinical Alzheimer's disease status (S. C. Li & U. Lindenberger, 1999). Using cross-sectional community data from 2,317 individuals aged 60-64 years, the authors of this study found that variability was greater in individuals who met criteria for mild cognitive impairment or aging-associated cognitive decline but not for age-associated memory impairment. Higher variability was associated with lower education and a non-English-speaking background. In contrast to previous findings, variability in this study did not contribute uniquely to meeting criteria for mild cognitive impairment. The reasons for the differences may reside in the authors' method of estimating mean independent variability, the use of an occasion-specific measure, or the relatively younger age of the participants. Follow-up of the cohort in 4 years will yield data on the prospective validity of variability as a risk factor for impairment.
dc.identifier.issn0894-4105
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/81887
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Association
dc.sourceNeuropsychology
dc.subjectKeywords: adult; age; Alzheimer disease; article; cognitive defect; cohort analysis; disease marker; disease severity; education; follow up; human; major clinical study; memory disorder; priority journal; risk factor; task performance; Adult; Age Factors; Aging; As Aging; Cognition; Dementia; Intraindividual variability; Mild cognitive impairment
dc.titleWithin- Occasion Intraindividual Variability and Preclinical Diagnostic Status: Is Intraindividual Variability an Indicator of Mild Cognitive Impairment?
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue3
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage317
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage309
local.contributor.affiliationChristensen, Helen, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationDear, Keith, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationAnstey, Kaarin, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationParslow, Ruth, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationSachdev, Perminder Singh, University of New South Wales (Prince of Wales Hospital)
local.contributor.affiliationJorm, Anthony F, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.authoruidChristensen, Helen, u8804902
local.contributor.authoruidDear, Keith, u9909577
local.contributor.authoruidAnstey, Kaarin, u4038535
local.contributor.authoruidParslow, Ruth, u9912888
local.contributor.authoruidJorm, Anthony F, u8409322
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.description.refereedYes
local.identifier.absfor170102 - Developmental Psychology and Ageing
local.identifier.ariespublicationMigratedxPub10195
local.identifier.citationvolume19
local.identifier.doi10.1037/0894-4105.19.3.309
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-19444375718
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads