Multiple Sulfur Isotope Analyses Support a Magmatic Model for the Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide Deposits of the Teutonic Bore Volcanic Complex, Yilgarn Craton, Western Australia
Loading...
Date
Authors
Chen, Mimi
Campbell, Ian H.
Xue, Yunxing
Tian, Wei
Ireland, Trevor R.
Holden, Peter
Cas, Raymond A.F.
Hayman, Patrick C.
Das, Ritipurna
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Society of Economic Geologists
Abstract
We report sensitive high mass resolution ion microprobe, stable isotopes (SHRIMP SI) multiple sulfur
isotope analyses (32S, 33S, 34S) to constrain the sources of sulfur in three Archean VMS deposits—Teutonic
Bore, Bentley, and Jaguar—from the Teutonic Bore volcanic complex of the Yilgarn Craton, Western Australia,
together with sedimentary pyrites from associated black shales and interpillow pyrites. The pyrites from VMS
mineralization are dominated by mantle sulfur but include a small amount of slightly negative mass-independent
fractionation (MIF) anomalies, whereas sulfur from the pyrites in the sedimentary rocks has pronounced
positive MIF, with ∆33S values that lie between 0.19 and 6.20‰ (with one outlier at –1.62‰). The wall rocks
to the mineralization include sedimentary rocks that have contributed no detectable positive MIF sulfur to the
VMS deposits, which is difficult to reconcile with the leaching model for the formation of these deposits. The
sulfur isotope data are best explained by mixing between sulfur derived from a magmatic-hydrothermal fluid
and seawater sulfur as represented by the interpillow pyrites. The massive sulfide lens pyrites have a weighted
mean ∆33S value of –0.27 ± 0.05‰ (MSWD = 1.6) nearly identical with –0.31 ± 0.08‰ (MSWD = 2.4) for
pyrites from the stringer zone, which requires mixing to have occurred below the sea floor. We employed a twocomponent
mixing model to estimate the contribution of seawater sulfur to the total sulfur budget of the two
Teutonic Bore volcanic complex VMS deposits. The results are 15 to 18% for both Teutonic Bore and Bentley,
much higher than the 3% obtained by Jamieson et al. (2013) for the giant Kidd Creek deposit. Similar calculations,
carried out for other Neoarchean VMS deposits give value between 2% and 30%, which are similar to
modern hydrothermal VMS deposits. We suggest that multiple sulfur isotope analyses may be used to predict
the size of Archean VMS deposits and to provide a vector to ore deposit but further studies are needed to test
these suggestions.
Description
Citation
Collections
Source
Economic Geology
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
Open Access
License Rights
Restricted until
2037-12-31
Downloads
File
Description