Which egg features predict egg rejection responses in American robins? Replicating Rothstein's (1982) study

dc.contributor.authorLuro, Alec B
dc.contributor.authorIgic, Branislav
dc.contributor.authorCroston, Rebecca
dc.contributor.authorLopez, Analia V.
dc.contributor.authorShawkey, Matthew D.
dc.contributor.authorHauber, Mark E
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-06T00:07:05Z
dc.date.available2022-01-06T00:07:05Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.updated2020-11-23T12:02:16Z
dc.description.abstractRothstein (Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 11, 1982, 229) was one of the first comprehensive studies to examine how different egg features influence egg rejection behaviors of avian brood parasite-hosts. The methods and conclusions of Rothstein (1982) laid the foundation for subsequent experimental brood parasitism studies over the past thirty years, but its results have never been evaluated with replication. Here, we partially replicated Rothstein's (1982) experiments using parallel artificial model egg treatments to simulate cowbird (Molothrus ater) parasitism in American robin (Turdus migratorius) nests. We compared our data with those of Rothstein (1982) and confirmed most of its original findings: (1) robins reject model eggs that differ from the appearance of a natural robin egg toward that of a natural cowbird egg in background color, size, and maculation; (2) rejection responses were best predicted by model egg background color; and (3) model eggs differing by two or more features from natural robin eggs were more likely to be rejected than model eggs differing by one feature alone. In contrast with Rothstein's (1982) conclusion that American robin egg recognition is not specifically tuned toward rejection of brown-headed cowbird eggs, we argue that our results and those of other recent studies of robin egg rejection suggest a discrimination bias toward rejection of cowbird eggs. Future work on egg recognition will benefit from utilizing a range of model eggs varying continuously in background color, maculation patterning, and size in combination with avian visual modeling, rather than using model eggs which vary only discretely.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipwe thank the Human Frontiers Science Program (to MEH) and the Harley Jones van Cleave Professorship in Host- Parasite Interactions at the University of Illinois, Urbana- Champaignen_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn2045-7758en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/258215
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_AU
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Incen_AU
dc.rights© 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltden_AU
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution Licenseen_AU
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_AU
dc.sourceEcology and Evolutionen_AU
dc.subjectavian brood parasitismen_AU
dc.subjectegg recognitionen_AU
dc.subjectMolothrus ateren_AU
dc.subjectTurdus migratoriusen_AU
dc.titleWhich egg features predict egg rejection responses in American robins? Replicating Rothstein's (1982) studyen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue3en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage1679en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1673en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationLuro, Alec B, University of Illinoisen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationIgic, Branislav, College of Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationCroston, Rebecca, U.S. Geological Surveyen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationLopez, Analia V., Universidad de Buenos Airesen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationShawkey, Matthew D., University of Ghenten_AU
local.contributor.affiliationHauber, Mark E, University of Illinoisen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidIgic, Branislav, u4798587en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor060201 - Behavioural Ecologyen_AU
local.identifier.absseo970106 - Expanding Knowledge in the Biological Sciencesen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4485658xPUB2285en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume8en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1002/ece3.3759en_AU
local.identifier.thomsonID000423807900021
local.publisher.urlhttp://www.ecolevol.org/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Luro_Which_egg_features_predict_egg_2018.pdf
Size:
479.89 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format