Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Walter Burley Griffin is dead. Long live Walter Burley Griffin's planning ideals!

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Wensing, Ed

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Taylor & Francis (Routledge)

Abstract

In 2010 the ACT Government commenced a major public consultation exercise called ‘Time to Talk – Canberra 2030’ on Canberra’s long term future as part of developing a new strategy plan for Canberra. In this context, the then ACT Planning Minister, Andrew Barr MLA, published a short article on his personal website proclaiming that Walter Burley Griffin is dead. According to Barr, Griffin has not had any involvement in the planning and development of Canberra since 1920 and that his plans for the city were never really implemented. Barr stated Griffin’s ideals should not be ‘re-interpreted’ and we ‘should not be casting back a century for answers to Canberra’s contemporary challenges’ because ‘Griffin could never have foreseen the changes in lifestyles that technology has delivered and that climate change will require’. Barr bemoaned the fact that Griffin’s legacy continues to dominate debate about the future of Canberra and that Griffin is still held in high regard in Canberra planning circles. Barr argued therefore, that it was time to move beyond Griffin’s planning legacy. Despite the fact that no planner can ever clearly foresee the changes the future brings, there are several good reasons why Griffin’s planning ideals continue to pervade Canberra’s planning. This article explores two of Griffin’s planning ideals for Canberra and how they have endured in the development of two of Canberra’s strategic plans. The paper argues that these planning ideals still have currency today and will continue to have currency well into the future.

Description

Citation

Source

Urban Policy and Research 31.2 (2013): 226-240

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

Restricted until