A comparison of thermal maturity parameters between freely extracted hydrocarbons (Bitumen I) and a second extract (Bitumen II) from within the kerogen matrix of Permian and Triassic sedimentary rocks

dc.contributor.authorNabbefeld, Birgit
dc.contributor.authorGrice, Kliti
dc.contributor.authorSchiummelmann, Arndt
dc.contributor.authorSummons, R E
dc.contributor.authorTroitzsch, Ulrike
dc.contributor.authorTwitchett, Richard J
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-07T22:30:46Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T08:23:19Z
dc.description.abstractIn this study we compared various maturity dependent aromatic, steroid and triterpenoid hydrocarbon ratios in bitumens that are freely extractable from sedimentary rocks (Bitumen I) with those in second extracts that comprised hydrocarbons closely associated with the kerogen/mineral matrix (Bitumen II). Bitumen II was released through kerogen isolation and demineralisation using HCl and HF/H3BO3. The samples studied, although of similar age, come from different localities. They represent a range of facies and two kerogen types (II and III), and all were deposited under marine conditions. The results show that the more stable β isomers of methylnaphthalene (MN) and methylphenanthrene (MP) are relatively more abundant in Bitumen II. The difference between the methylnaphthalene ratio (MNR) of Bitumens I and II, when plotted against the ratio of clay to total organic carbon (clay/TOC), gives an excellent correlation (R2 = 0.88). The highest clay/TOC ratio corresponds with the biggest difference in MNR for the respective bitumens, consistent with the more stable β isomers being preferentially retained within the clay/kerogen matrix. Since the β MP isomers are higher in Bitumen II than in Bitumen I, it was anticipated that their methylphenanthrene index (MPI-1) values, a commonly used measure of thermal maturity, would also be different. For most samples, the measured MPI-1 in Bitumen I is generally higher than that in Bitumen II (except for three samples), thus showing a bias towards a lower thermal maturity for the second extract. The opposite is true of the β/α MP ratio and MNR. This may be attributed to the fact that phenanthrene (P), which is part of the denominator in MPI-1, is more stable than its methylated counterparts. Steroid and triterpenoid maturity parameters also showed differences between the two extracts, with C27 diasterane/sterane and Ts/(Ts + Tm) being higher in Bitumen I. Only the former parameter is positively correlated with the clay/TOC ratio, suggesting that clay content probably influences the diagenetic transformation of steroid precursors to diasteranes. The observed differences between the maturity parameters of Bitumen I and Bitumen II may be especially important in sedimentary rocks that contain high percentages of clay minerals.
dc.identifier.issn0146-6380
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/22464
dc.publisherPergamon Press
dc.sourceOrganic Geochemistry
dc.subjectKeywords: Clay content; Demineralisation; Diagenetic transformation; Kerogen type; matrix; Methylnaphthalene; Permian; Thermal maturity; Total Organic Carbon; Triassic; Triterpenoids; Aromatic hydrocarbons; Clay minerals; Isomers; Kerogen; Organic carbon; Sedimento
dc.titleA comparison of thermal maturity parameters between freely extracted hydrocarbons (Bitumen I) and a second extract (Bitumen II) from within the kerogen matrix of Permian and Triassic sedimentary rocks
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue2
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage87
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage78
local.contributor.affiliationNabbefeld, Birgit, Curtin University of Technology
local.contributor.affiliationGrice, Kliti, Curtin University of Technology
local.contributor.affiliationSchiummelmann, Arndt, Indiana University
local.contributor.affiliationSummons, R E, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
local.contributor.affiliationTroitzsch, Ulrike, College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationTwitchett, Richard J, University of Plymouth
local.contributor.authoremailu4033864@anu.edu.au
local.contributor.authoruidTroitzsch, Ulrike, u4033864
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor040309 - Petroleum and Coal Geology
local.identifier.absfor040310 - Sedimentology
local.identifier.absfor030502 - Natural Products Chemistry
local.identifier.absseo850104 - Oil Shale and Tar Sands Exploration
local.identifier.ariespublicationf2965xPUB22
local.identifier.citationvolume41
local.identifier.doi10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.08.004
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-74149090641
local.identifier.thomsonID000274770000004
local.identifier.uidSubmittedByf2965
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
01_Nabbefeld_A_comparison_of_thermal_2010.pdf
Size:
831.61 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format