Skip navigation
Skip navigation

How should Hong Kong courts rule on the constitutionality of gay sex?

CollectionsSexualities, Genders and Rights in Asia: International Conference of Asian Queer Studies (2005)
Title: How should Hong Kong courts rule on the constitutionality of gay sex?
Author(s): Ip, Cliff
AsiaPacificQueer Network
Publisher: Canberra, ACT: The Australian National University
Citation: Ip, C. (2005, July). How should Hong Kong courts rule on the constitutionality of gay sex? Paper presented at Sexualities, Genders and Rights in Asia: 1st International Conference of Asian Queer Studies. Bangkok, Thailand: AsiaPacifiQueer Network, Mahidol University; Australian National University
Description: 
"As the Hong Kong (HK) court held that certain Crimes Ordinance provisions which provided for a different age of consent were unconstitutional in August 2005, a large part of the presented paper no longer seemed very relevant. However, the court did not discuss if cultural relativism and Confucianism were relevant in the judicial analysis. The following seeks to answer this question. This paper casts doubt on a general cultural relativist argument, as, for example, advocated by Dr. Joseph Chan. If this is wrong, homosexuality may still be compatible with Confucianism, the influential school of thought in HK, because I) the latter can be “re-interpreted” to protect homosexuals‚ interests and II) other Confucian places take homosexual rights more seriously than HK."
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1885/8668

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
Ip_HowHongKong2005.pdf68.64 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  19 May 2020/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator