Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Verdicts or Inventions? Interpreting Results from Randomized Controlled Experiments in Criminology

Sherman, Lawrence W; Strang, Heather


The social benefits of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) would be enhanced by general recognition of three problems of their interpretation and a redefinition of their mission in relation to program development and evaluation. One problem is that of "forest versus trees," or the sampling relationship between each test of a hypothesis and the conclusions drawn from all such tests taken together. A second problem is interpreting RCTs as testing theory or policy when they cannot achieve a high...[Show more]

CollectionsANU Research Publications
Date published: 2004
Type: Journal article
Source: American Behavioral Scientist
DOI: 10.1177/0002764203259294


File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Sherman_Verdicts_or_Inventions?_2004.pdf450.23 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy

Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  20 July 2017/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator