Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Successes and failures of attempts to embed socioeconomic dimensions in modeling for integrated natural resource management: lessons from Thailand

Ekasingh, Benchaphun; Letcher, Rebecca

Description

This paper discusses the necessity, successes and failures of attempts to embed socioeconomic aspects into integrated natural resource modeling. It uses experiences in Thailand over the last 20-30 years to illustrate advances and difficulties in this integration. The paper highlights strengths, weaknesses and the effectiveness of different approaches which are used to incorporate socioeconomic dynamic processes and impacts. Lessons learnt from Thai experiences starting from systems thinking and...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorEkasingh, Benchaphun
dc.contributor.authorLetcher, Rebecca
dc.contributor.editorAndre Zerger
dc.contributor.editorRobert M. Argent
dc.coverage.spatialMelbourne Australia
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-13T22:53:17Z
dc.date.available2015-12-13T22:53:17Z
dc.date.createdDecember 12 2005
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/81743
dc.description.abstractThis paper discusses the necessity, successes and failures of attempts to embed socioeconomic aspects into integrated natural resource modeling. It uses experiences in Thailand over the last 20-30 years to illustrate advances and difficulties in this integration. The paper highlights strengths, weaknesses and the effectiveness of different approaches which are used to incorporate socioeconomic dynamic processes and impacts. Lessons learnt from Thai experiences starting from systems thinking and approaches through to attempts to model agricultural and watershed systems for management are reviewed. Historically successes in integrating socioeconomic dimensions with biophysical analyses lie most often in interaction with agricultural and natural resource economists who have more experience dealing with quantitative methods and "hard" numerical approaches than other social scientists. The need for the "soft" side of assessment is recognized but is not easily realized. Failures to include the perspectives of anthropologists, psychologists and sociologists in integrated assessments have been caused by departmental boundaries, inadequate linkages between social theories and differences in the agendas of these fields. Different approaches to the treatment of socioeconomic variables and processes are highlighted. Modeling approaches, such as agent-based systems or multi-agent systems are more tuned to socioeconomic concerns but must first pass the test of acceptability by policy makers who are used to top-down, simplified approaches to solving problems. Balancing, or even better, integrating "hard" and "soft" systems approaches will improve the relevance and validity of the models to solve agricultural/natural resource problems.
dc.publisherModelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand Inc.
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM 2005)
dc.sourceMODSIM05: International Congress on Modelling and Simulation Advances and Applications for Managememnt and Decision Making Proceedings
dc.source.urihttp://mssanz.org.au/modsim05/
dc.subjectKeywords: Agent-based systems; Biophysical analysis; Dynamic process; Integrated assessment; Modeling approach; Natural resource management; Numerical approaches; Policy makers; Quantitative method; Resource economists; Resource modeling; Social scientists; Social Integrated natural resource modeling; Socioeconomic analysis; Systems approach
dc.titleSuccesses and failures of attempts to embed socioeconomic dimensions in modeling for integrated natural resource management: lessons from Thailand
dc.typeConference paper
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.description.refereedYes
dc.date.issued2005
local.identifier.absfor140205 - Environment and Resource Economics
local.identifier.ariespublicationMigratedxPub10044
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationEkasingh, Benchaphun, Chiang Mai University
local.contributor.affiliationLetcher, Rebecca, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage10
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T09:46:43Z
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-79952036840
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

There are no files associated with this item.


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  23 August 2018/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator