Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Executioner or disciplinarian: WTO accession and the Chinese auto industry

Noble, Gregory W; Ravenhill, Frederick John; Doner, Richard F

Description

Negotiations for China's accession to the WTO provoked a debate between pessimists who believed that opening the economy would lead to a flood of imports and a denationalization of manufacturing industry, and those who believed that it would spur rationalization of state-owned enterprises, lock in domestic reforms, attract foreign investment, and open the way for trade expansion. The industry most frequently mentioned as endangered was motor vehicles, where an awkward combination of Stalinist...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorNoble, Gregory W
dc.contributor.authorRavenhill, Frederick John
dc.contributor.authorDoner, Richard F
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-13T22:45:51Z
dc.identifier.issn1469-3569
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/79984
dc.description.abstractNegotiations for China's accession to the WTO provoked a debate between pessimists who believed that opening the economy would lead to a flood of imports and a denationalization of manufacturing industry, and those who believed that it would spur rationalization of state-owned enterprises, lock in domestic reforms, attract foreign investment, and open the way for trade expansion. The industry most frequently mentioned as endangered was motor vehicles, where an awkward combination of Stalinist central planning with localized autarky had resulted in a proliferation of inefficient producers. With the partial exception of two investments by Volkswagen, initial joint ventures in assembly operations failed miserably. China's commitments on joining the WTO banned (or at least complicated) many of the most important industrial policy tools it had used to promote the auto industry since the opening to joint ventures in the early 1980s-including performance requirements, high tariffs, and numerical quotas. After accession in 2001, tariffs fell steadily while output and foreign investment soared. The Chinese government moved towards a lighter-handed but more effective form of industrial policy that reduced top-down planning while expanding market incentives and scope for managerial freedom. Rather than destroying industrial policy for the auto industry, WTO accession constrained and disciplined it. When foreign auto firms and their governments pushed for more aggressive protection of trademarks and other intellectual property rights under the WTO, the Chinese government initially stalled. Continuing pressure then tilted the balance of state policy toward promotion of independent design, whether by state-owned enterprises testing the boundaries of their joint ventures with foreign multinationals, or by audacious smaller firms purchasing foreign designs and technology to complement inexpensive local parts and assembly, thereby creating the conditions for the emergence of a more competitive industry.
dc.publisherBerkeley Electronic Press
dc.sourceBusiness and Politics
dc.source.urihttp://www.bepress.com/bap/vol7/iss2/
dc.subjectKeywords: Auto industry; China; Industrial policy; Trade; TRIMs; TRIPs; WTO
dc.titleExecutioner or disciplinarian: WTO accession and the Chinese auto industry
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.description.refereedYes
local.identifier.citationvolume7
dc.date.issued2005
local.identifier.absfor160607 - International Relations
local.identifier.ariespublicationMigratedxPub8330
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationNoble, Gregory W, University of Tokyo
local.contributor.affiliationRavenhill, Frederick John, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationDoner, Richard F, Emory University
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.bibliographicCitation.issue2
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage33
dc.date.updated2015-12-11T10:25:33Z
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-27944460924
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Noble_Executioner_or_disciplinarian:_2005.pdf560.89 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator