Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Commentary on Dowling et al. (2016): Is it time to stop conducting problem gambling prevalence studies?

Markham, Francis; Young, Martin

Description

The dual-frame survey conducted by Dowling and colleagues should cause gambling researchers to re-evaluate the scientific value of routinely conducting problem gambling prevalence studies. A better use of resources would support research designed to reduce the incidence of gambling-related harm rather than perpetuate its ongoing mismeasurement.

dc.contributor.authorMarkham, Francis
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Martin
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-15T03:15:07Z
dc.identifier.issn0965-2140
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/733712899
dc.description.abstractThe dual-frame survey conducted by Dowling and colleagues should cause gambling researchers to re-evaluate the scientific value of routinely conducting problem gambling prevalence studies. A better use of resources would support research designed to reduce the incidence of gambling-related harm rather than perpetuate its ongoing mismeasurement.
dc.description.sponsorshipF.M. is supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award.
dc.format2 pages
dc.publisherWiley
dc.rights© 2016 Society for the Study of Addiction.
dc.sourceAddiction
dc.subjectepidemiology
dc.subjectgambling
dc.subjectpathological
dc.subjectprevalence
dc.subjectproblem
dc.titleCommentary on Dowling et al. (2016): Is it time to stop conducting problem gambling prevalence studies?
dc.typeJournal article
local.identifier.citationvolume111
dc.date.issued2016-02-09
local.publisher.urlhttp://au.wiley.com/
local.type.statusAccepted Version
local.contributor.affiliationMarkham, Francis, Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University
local.identifier.essn1360-0443
local.bibliographicCitation.issue3
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage436
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage437
local.identifier.doi10.1111/add.13216
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dc.provenancehttp://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/0965-2140/ Author can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing), after a 12 months embargo period (Sherpa/Romeo as of 15/2/2016).
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01 Markham F and Young M Commentary on Dowling 2016.pdf389.6 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator