Skip navigation
Skip navigation

The language of possession: Three case studies

Keen, Ian

Description

Anthropologists often construe property in terms of rights, obligations, and interests, or use property in a largely undefined way. The use of the language of rights as a metalanguage is questionable for it is culturally specific, having developed in the

dc.contributor.authorKeen, Ian
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-13T22:22:48Z
dc.identifier.issn0047-4045
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/72436
dc.description.abstractAnthropologists often construe property in terms of rights, obligations, and interests, or use property in a largely undefined way. The use of the language of rights as a metalanguage is questionable for it is culturally specific, having developed in the
dc.publisherCambridge University Press
dc.sourceLanguage in Society
dc.titleThe language of possession: Three case studies
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.citationvolume42
dc.date.issued2013
local.identifier.absfor160103 - Linguistic Anthropology
local.identifier.ariespublicationf5625xPUB3244
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationKeen, Ian, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANU
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.bibliographicCitation.issue2
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage187
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage214
local.identifier.doi10.1017/S0047404513000043
local.identifier.absseo970120 - Expanding Knowledge in Languages, Communication and Culture
dc.date.updated2015-12-11T07:59:03Z
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-84875948360
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Keen_The_language_of_possession:_2013.pdf292 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  19 May 2020/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator