Two arguments for child enfranchisement
-
Altmetric Citations
Description
The right to vote is fundamental to democratic citizenship; it is one of the most important badges of political and legal equality. However, we deny it to children, generally without discussion. After exploring conceptions of 'political capacity', I launch two arguments. The first is the Symmetry Argument: whatever level of capacity we use for the disenfranchisement of children should be used in symmetrical fashion to disenfranchise the elderly. The second is the Argument from Domains: if we...[Show more]
dc.contributor.author | Lau, Joanne | |
---|---|---|
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-12-13T22:19:44Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0032-3217 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1885/71971 | |
dc.description.abstract | The right to vote is fundamental to democratic citizenship; it is one of the most important badges of political and legal equality. However, we deny it to children, generally without discussion. After exploring conceptions of 'political capacity', I launch two arguments. The first is the Symmetry Argument: whatever level of capacity we use for the disenfranchisement of children should be used in symmetrical fashion to disenfranchise the elderly. The second is the Argument from Domains: if we attribute responsibility to children in the legal domain, we should also attribute it to them in the political domain. If we do not actually disenfranchise the elderly, we must find a good reason why we displace that symmetry. I discuss such objections and show why they can be refuted or disregarded. | |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd | |
dc.source | Political Studies | |
dc.subject | Keywords: Children; Enfranchisement; Political capacity; Symmetry; Voting age | |
dc.title | Two arguments for child enfranchisement | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
local.description.notes | Imported from ARIES | |
local.identifier.citationvolume | 60 | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
local.identifier.absfor | 160609 - Political Theory and Political Philosophy | |
local.identifier.ariespublication | f5625xPUB2982 | |
local.type.status | Published Version | |
local.contributor.affiliation | Lau, Joanne, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANU | |
local.description.embargo | 2037-12-31 | |
local.bibliographicCitation.issue | 4 | |
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage | 860 | |
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage | 876 | |
local.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00940.x | |
local.identifier.absseo | 970122 - Expanding Knowledge in Philosophy and Religious Studies | |
dc.date.updated | 2016-02-24T09:04:31Z | |
local.identifier.scopusID | 2-s2.0-84868575659 | |
local.identifier.thomsonID | 000310676300008 | |
Collections | ANU Research Publications |
Download
File | Description | Size | Format | Image |
---|---|---|---|---|
01_Lau_Two_arguments_for_child_2012.pdf | 175.99 kB | Adobe PDF | Request a copy |
Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Updated: 17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer: University Librarian/ Page Contact: Library Systems & Web Coordinator