Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Courts of many minds

Spiekermann, Kai; Goodin, Robert


In A Constitution of Many Minds Cass Sunstein argues that the three major approaches to constitutional interpretation - Traditionalism, Populism and Cosmopolitanism - all rely on some variation of a 'many-minds' argument. Here we assess each of these claims through the lens of the Condorcet Jury Theorem. In regard to the first two approaches we explore the implications of sequential influence among courts (past and foreign, respectively). In regard to the Populist approach, we consider the...[Show more]

CollectionsANU Research Publications
Date published: 2012
Type: Journal article
Source: British Journal of Political Science
DOI: 10.1017/S000712341100041X


File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Spiekermann_Courts_of_many_minds_2012.pdf776.75 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy

Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  12 November 2018/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator