Skip navigation
Skip navigation

The construct validity of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire for aboriginal children living in urban New South Wales, Australia

Williamson, Anna B; McElDuff, Patrick; Dadds, Mark; D'Este, Catherine; Redman, Sally; Raphael, Beverley; Daniels, John; Eades, Sandra

Description

The current study explores the construct validity of the standard Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for Aboriginal children living in urban communities in New South Wales, Australia. Parent report SDQ data from the first 717 Aboriginal children aged 4-17 years who participated in the baseline survey of the Study of Environment on Aboriginal Resilience and Child Health were analysed. The overall construct validity of the SDQ in our sample was acceptable but not "good." The internal...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorWilliamson, Anna B
dc.contributor.authorMcElDuff, Patrick
dc.contributor.authorDadds, Mark
dc.contributor.authorD'Este, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorRedman, Sally
dc.contributor.authorRaphael, Beverley
dc.contributor.authorDaniels, John
dc.contributor.authorEades, Sandra
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T23:36:39Z
dc.identifier.issn0005-0067
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/70237
dc.description.abstractThe current study explores the construct validity of the standard Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for Aboriginal children living in urban communities in New South Wales, Australia. Parent report SDQ data from the first 717 Aboriginal children aged 4-17 years who participated in the baseline survey of the Study of Environment on Aboriginal Resilience and Child Health were analysed. The overall construct validity of the SDQ in our sample was acceptable but not "good." The internal consistency reliability was excellent overall and good for all subscales with the exception of peer problems, a concept that may have a different significance for urban Aboriginal parents. Removing the peer relationships subscale, however, did not improve the fit of the model. The convergent validity of the SDQ was good. The prosocial behaviours scale and both the peer and conduct problems scales were highly correlated suggesting Aboriginal parents conceptualise these differently and that prosocial behaviours may be considered a key indicator of well-being for Aboriginal children. Overall, the SDQ is a promising tool for urban Aboriginal children in New South Wales. Those working with Aboriginal young people should focus on the SDQ total difficulties score and limit their reliance on the peer relationships subscale.
dc.publisherAustralian Psychological Society
dc.sourceAustralian Psychologist
dc.titleThe construct validity of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire for aboriginal children living in urban New South Wales, Australia
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.citationvolume49
dc.date.issued2014
local.identifier.absfor111717 - Primary Health Care
local.identifier.ariespublicationU3488905xPUB2262
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationWilliamson, Anna B, The Sax Institue
local.contributor.affiliationMcElDuff, Patrick, University of Newcastle
local.contributor.affiliationDadds, Mark, University of New South Wales
local.contributor.affiliationD'Este, Catherine, University of Newcastle
local.contributor.affiliationRedman, Sally, SAX Institute
local.contributor.affiliationRaphael, Beverley, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationDaniels, John, Aboriginal Medical Services Coop Ltd
local.contributor.affiliationEades, Sandra, The University of Sydney
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.bibliographicCitation.issue3
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage163
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage170
local.identifier.doi10.1111/ap.12045
dc.date.updated2015-12-10T11:55:52Z
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-84899481663
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Williamson_The_construct_validity_of_the_2014.pdf510.75 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator