Chapter III of the Constitution, federal jurisdiction and dialogue charters of human rights
Bateman, Will; Stellios, James
Description
The High Court's decision in Momcilovic v The Queen is the first to consider the compatibility of the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities 2006 (Vic) with ch III of the Constitution. The decision will have significant implications for the continuing effectiveness of key provisions of the Charter, the Human Rights Act 2004 (ACT) and any future federal charter of human rights. This article analyses the decision and evaluates its implications for the dialogue model of statutory human...[Show more]
dc.contributor.author | Bateman, Will | |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Stellios, James | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-12-10T23:34:42Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0025-8938 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1885/69536 | |
dc.description.abstract | The High Court's decision in Momcilovic v The Queen is the first to consider the compatibility of the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities 2006 (Vic) with ch III of the Constitution. The decision will have significant implications for the continuing effectiveness of key provisions of the Charter, the Human Rights Act 2004 (ACT) and any future federal charter of human rights. This article analyses the decision and evaluates its implications for the dialogue model of statutory human rights protection in Australia. It also considers several controversial statements concerning the principles of federal jurisdiction that arise from the decision. | |
dc.publisher | Melbourne University Law Review Association | |
dc.rights | Author/s retain copyright | |
dc.source | Melbourne University Law Review | |
dc.source.uri | http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=723042058442542;res=IELHSS | |
dc.title | Chapter III of the Constitution, federal jurisdiction and dialogue charters of human rights | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
local.description.notes | Imported from ARIES | |
local.identifier.citationvolume | 36 | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
local.identifier.absfor | 180114 - Human Rights Law | |
local.identifier.ariespublication | f5625xPUB2051 | |
local.type.status | Published Version | |
local.contributor.affiliation | Bateman, Will, Supreme Court of New South Wales | |
local.contributor.affiliation | Stellios, James, ANU College of Law, ANU | |
local.bibliographicCitation.issue | 1 | |
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage | 1 | |
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage | 40 | |
local.identifier.absseo | 940401 - Civil Justice | |
dc.date.updated | 2015-12-10T11:35:25Z | |
local.identifier.scopusID | 2-s2.0-84871265449 | |
local.identifier.thomsonID | 000308399100001 | |
dcterms.accessRights | Open Access | |
Collections | ANU Research Publications |
Download
File | Description | Size | Format | Image |
---|---|---|---|---|
01_Bateman_Chapter_III_of_the_2012.pdf | 2.43 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Updated: 17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer: University Librarian/ Page Contact: Library Systems & Web Coordinator