Magnetism in meta-semantics is the view that the meaning of our words is determined in part by their use and in part by the objective naturalness of candidate meanings. This hypothesis is commonly attributed to David Lewis, and has been put to philosophical work by Brian Weatherson, Ted Sider and others. I argue that there is no evidence that Lewis ever endorsed the view, and that his actual account of language reveals good reasons against it.
|Collections||ANU Research Publications|
|Source:||Australasian Journal of Philosophy|
|Schwarz Against Magnetism 2013.pdf||Author/s accepted manuscript (AAM)/post-print||298.88 kB||Adobe PDF||Request a copy|
|01_Schwarz_Against_magnetism_2014.pdf||Published version||180.61 kB||Adobe PDF||Request a copy|
Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.