Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Response to Goldstein

Garrett, Brian

Description

In 'The Sorites is disguised nonsense' Analysis (2012) 77: 61-5 L Goldstein attempts to show that some of the conditionals in any Sorites argument are nonsensical, and hence no Sorites argument can be sound. I give four reasons why this is not the case.

dc.contributor.authorGarrett, Brian
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T23:30:47Z
dc.identifier.issn0003-2638
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/68332
dc.description.abstractIn 'The Sorites is disguised nonsense' Analysis (2012) 77: 61-5 L Goldstein attempts to show that some of the conditionals in any Sorites argument are nonsensical, and hence no Sorites argument can be sound. I give four reasons why this is not the case.
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd
dc.sourceAnalysis
dc.titleResponse to Goldstein
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.citationvolume72
dc.date.issued2012
local.identifier.absfor220313 - Philosophy of Language
local.identifier.ariespublicationf5625xPUB1684
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationGarrett, Brian, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANU
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.bibliographicCitation.issue4
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage742
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage744
local.identifier.doi10.1093/analys/ans104
dc.date.updated2015-12-10T11:09:32Z
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-84867413438
local.identifier.thomsonID000310098000017
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Garrett_Response_to_Goldstein_2012.pdf70.83 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  22 January 2019/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator