Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Household perceptions of climate change and preferences for mitigation action: the case of the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme in Australia

Akter, Sonia; Bennett, Jeffrey

Description

The study aims to reveal Australian households' perceptions of climate change and their preferences for mitigation action. A web-based survey was conducted in November 2008 in which over 600 households from the state of New South Wales were asked for their willingness to bear extra household expenditure to support the 'Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme', an emissions trading scheme proposed by the Australian government. The results of the study can be summarized in four key findings. First,...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorAkter, Sonia
dc.contributor.authorBennett, Jeffrey
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T23:26:23Z
dc.identifier.issn0165-0009
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/67734
dc.description.abstractThe study aims to reveal Australian households' perceptions of climate change and their preferences for mitigation action. A web-based survey was conducted in November 2008 in which over 600 households from the state of New South Wales were asked for their willingness to bear extra household expenditure to support the 'Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme', an emissions trading scheme proposed by the Australian government. The results of the study can be summarized in four key findings. First, respondents' willingness to pay for climate change mitigation is significantly influenced by their beliefs of future temperature rise. Support for the policy increased at a decreasing rate as the perceived temperature change rose. Second, perceptions of policy failure have a significant negative impact on respondents' support for the proposed mitigation measure. The higher the perceived likelihood that the measure would not deliver any outcome, the lower was the likelihood that respondents would support the policy. Third, respondent preferences for the proposed policy are influenced by the possibility of reaching a global agreement on emissions reduction. Sample respondents stated significantly higher values for the policy when the biggest polluting countries implement a similar scheme. Finally, respondents' willingness to take action against climate change, both at the national and household level, is found to be influenced by their level of mass-media exposure. Particularly, those respondents who watched 'An Inconvenient Truth' were significantly more likely to act for climate change mitigation than others.
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers
dc.sourceClimatic Change
dc.subjectKeywords: Australia; Carbon pollution; Climate change mitigation; Emissions reduction; Emissions Trading Scheme; Household expenditure; Household level; Mitigation measures; Negative impacts; New South Wales; Perceived temperature; Temperature rise; Web-based surve
dc.titleHousehold perceptions of climate change and preferences for mitigation action: the case of the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme in Australia
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.citationvolume109
dc.date.issued2011
local.identifier.absfor050206 - Environmental Monitoring
local.identifier.ariespublicationf2965xPUB1511
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationAkter, Sonia, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationBennett, Jeffrey, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANU
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.bibliographicCitation.issue3-4
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage417
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage436
local.identifier.doi10.1007/s10584-011-0034-8
local.identifier.absseo960703 - Environmental Education and Awareness
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T08:14:43Z
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-81555214482
local.identifier.thomsonID000297350700011
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Akter_Household_perceptions_of_2011.pdf326.06 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  20 July 2017/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator