Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Easy to say, hard to do: Integrated surface water and groundwater management in the Murray-Darling Basin

Ross, Andrew

Description

Integrated management of surface water and groundwater can provide efficient and flexible use of water through wet and dry periods, and address the impacts of water use on other users and the environment. It can also help adaptation to climate variation and uncertainty by means of supply diversification, storage and exchange. Integrated water management is affected by surface water and groundwater resources and their connections, water use, infrastructure, governance arrangements and...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorRoss, Andrew
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T23:19:42Z
dc.identifier.issn1366-7017
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/66007
dc.description.abstractIntegrated management of surface water and groundwater can provide efficient and flexible use of water through wet and dry periods, and address the impacts of water use on other users and the environment. It can also help adaptation to climate variation and uncertainty by means of supply diversification, storage and exchange. Integrated water management is affected by surface water and groundwater resources and their connections, water use, infrastructure, governance arrangements and interactions. Although the Murray-Darling Basin is considered to be a leading example of integrated water management, surface water and groundwater resources are generally managed separately. Key reasons for this separation include the historical priority given to surface water development, the relative neglect of groundwater management, shortfalls in information about connections between groundwater and surface water and their impacts, gaps and exemptions in surface water and groundwater use entitlements and rules, coordination problems, and limited stakeholder engagement. Integration of surface water and groundwater management can be improved by the establishment of more comprehensive water use entitlements and rules, with extended carry-over periods and legislated rules for aquifer storage and recovery. Collective surface water and groundwater management offers greater efficiency and better risk management than uncoordinated individual action. There are opportunities for more effective engagement of stakeholders in planning and implementation through decentralized catchment scale organizations.
dc.publisherIWA Publishing
dc.sourceWater Policy
dc.subjectKeywords: Entitlements; Governance; Groundwater; Integrated; Management organization; Murray-Darling Basin; Rules; Surface water
dc.titleEasy to say, hard to do: Integrated surface water and groundwater management in the Murray-Darling Basin
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.citationvolume14
dc.date.issued2012
local.identifier.absfor050205 - Environmental Management
local.identifier.ariespublicationf5625xPUB1200
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationRoss, Andrew, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.bibliographicCitation.issue4
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage709
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage724
local.identifier.doi10.2166/wp.2012.129
local.identifier.absseo960706 - Rural Water Policy
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T08:40:26Z
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-84865779931
local.identifier.thomsonID000305802700010
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Ross_Easy_to_say,_hard_to_do:_2012.pdf281.54 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator