Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Assembly rules are rare in SE Australian bird communities, but sometimes apply in fragmented agricultural landscapes

Driscoll, Don; Lindenmayer, David B

Description

Assembly rules have been difficult to observe partly because species interactions vary with resource availability, the amount of disturbance, and species richness. Using bird survey data from two years in five regions of SE Australia (463 sites), we tested six predictions from assembly rules theory. We developed generalised linear models for all pair-wise species comparisons within a region, after first taking vegetation differences among sites into account. We found: 1) that disturbed and...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorDriscoll, Don
dc.contributor.authorLindenmayer, David B
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T22:54:37Z
dc.identifier.issn0906-7590
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/59722
dc.description.abstractAssembly rules have been difficult to observe partly because species interactions vary with resource availability, the amount of disturbance, and species richness. Using bird survey data from two years in five regions of SE Australia (463 sites), we tested six predictions from assembly rules theory. We developed generalised linear models for all pair-wise species comparisons within a region, after first taking vegetation differences among sites into account. We found: 1) that disturbed and fragmented agricultural landscapes had more negative relationships because aggressive honeyeaters monopolised patches; 2) differences between wet and dry years (high and low resources) were attributed to emigration, immigration, and reduced intensity of negative interactions in the dry year, and not to more intense competition; 3) although negative correlations were expected among ecologically-similar species, we observed the opposite pattern with significant positive associations in fragmented landscapes; 4) relationships involving aggressive honeyeaters led to more negative relationships as predicted; however, this was only observed in fragmented landscapes and was not significant in every year; 5) in two agricultural landscapes, there were fewer negative relationships in low species-richness sites, probably because one species from each pair had low abundance. This enabled us to suggest dominance relationships among species pairs; 6) there was evidence of more negative relationships in low-disturbance sites in agricultural landscapes as predicted. However, instead of the mechanism predicted by theory (reduced disruption allowing assembly processes to approach equilibrium), we suggest that sites with low disturbance represent resources worthy of defence by dominant species. We conclude that bird communities in SE Australia are rarely limited by negative species interactions, although aggressive honeyeaters are a feature of fragmented landscapes. However, diverse mechanisms underlie the temporal and spatial variation in species interactions when they do occur, meaning that simple statements of assembly rules may not be useful in these systems.
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd
dc.sourceEcography
dc.subjectKeywords: abundance; aggression; agricultural land; assembly rule; disturbance; dominance; habitat fragmentation; migration; numerical model; passerine; resource availability; spatiotemporal analysis; species richness; Australia; Aves; Meliphagidae
dc.titleAssembly rules are rare in SE Australian bird communities, but sometimes apply in fragmented agricultural landscapes
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.citationvolume33
dc.date.issued2010
local.identifier.absfor060207 - Population Ecology
local.identifier.ariespublicationU4279067xPUB505
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationDriscoll, Don, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationLindenmayer, David, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage854
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage865
local.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06094.x
local.identifier.absseo960804 - Farmland, Arable Cropland and Permanent Cropland Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T10:51:29Z
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-78049430055
local.identifier.thomsonID000283690900005
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Driscoll_Assembly_rules_are_rare_in_SE_2010.pdf159.56 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  19 May 2020/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator