Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Evaluating cases in legal disputes as rival theories

Li, Jason; Stenetorp, Pontus


In this paper we propose to draw a link from the quantitative notion of coherence, previously used to evaluate rival scientific theories, to legal reasoning. We evaluate the stories of the plaintiff and the defendant in a legal case as rival theories by measuring how well they cohere when accounting for the evidence. We show that this gives rise to a formalized comparison between rival cases that account for the same set of evidence, and provide a possible explanation as to why judgements may...[Show more]

CollectionsANU Research Publications
Date published: 2010
Type: Conference paper
Source: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop of Juris-infomatics (JURISIN 2009)
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-14888-0_6


File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Li_Evaluating_cases_in_legal_2010.pdf185.55 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy

Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  19 May 2020/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator