Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Is rigorous retrospective harmonization possible? Application of the DataSHaPER approach across 53 Large Studies

Fortier, Isabel; Doiron, Dany; Little, Julian; Ferretti, Vincent; L'Heureux, Francois; Stolk, Ronald P; Knoppers, Bartha M; Hudson, Thomas J; Burton, Paul R; International Harmonization Initiative, -; Banks, Emily

Description

Background: Proper understanding of the roles of, and interactions between genetic, lifestyle, environmental and psycho-social factors in determining the risk of development and/or progression of chronic diseases requires access to very large high-quality databases. Because of the financial, technical and time burdens related to developing and maintaining very large studies, the scientific community is increasingly synthesizing data from multiple studies to construct large databases. However,...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorFortier, Isabel
dc.contributor.authorDoiron, Dany
dc.contributor.authorLittle, Julian
dc.contributor.authorFerretti, Vincent
dc.contributor.authorL'Heureux, Francois
dc.contributor.authorStolk, Ronald P
dc.contributor.authorKnoppers, Bartha M
dc.contributor.authorHudson, Thomas J
dc.contributor.authorBurton, Paul R
dc.contributor.authorInternational Harmonization Initiative, -
dc.contributor.authorBanks, Emily
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T22:27:51Z
dc.identifier.issn0300-5771
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/54385
dc.description.abstractBackground: Proper understanding of the roles of, and interactions between genetic, lifestyle, environmental and psycho-social factors in determining the risk of development and/or progression of chronic diseases requires access to very large high-quality databases. Because of the financial, technical and time burdens related to developing and maintaining very large studies, the scientific community is increasingly synthesizing data from multiple studies to construct large databases. However, the data items collected by individual studies must be inferentially equivalent to be meaningfully synthesized. The DataSchema and Harmonization Platform for Epidemiological Research (DataSHaPER; http://www.datashaper.org) was developed to enable the rigorous assessment of the inferential equivalence, i.e. the potential for harmonization, of selected information from individual studies. Methods: This article examines the value of using the DataSHaPER for retrospective harmonization of established studies. Using the DataSHaPER approach, the potential to generate 148 harmonized variables from the questionnaires and physical measures collected in 53 large population-based studies (6.9 million participants) was assessed. Variable and study characteristics that might influence the potential for data synthesis were also explored. Results: Out of all assessment items evaluated (148 variables for each of the 53 studies), 38% could be harmonized. Certain characteristics of variables (i.e. relative importance, individual targeted, reference period) and of studies (i.e. observational units, data collection start date and mode of questionnaire administration) were associated with the potential for harmonization. For example, for variables deemed to be essential, 62% of assessment items paired could be harmonized. Conclusion: The current article shows that the DataSHaPER provides an effective and flexible approach for the retrospective harmonization of information across studies. To implement data synthesis, some additional scientific, ethico-legal and technical considerations must be addressed. The success of the DataSHaPER as a harmonization approach will depend on its continuing development and on the rigour and extent of its use. The DataSHaPER has the potential to take us closer to a truly collaborative epidemiology and offers the promise of enhanced research potential generated through synthesized databases.
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Epidemiology
dc.subjectKeywords: data quality; database; epidemiology; genetic analysis; health risk; lifestyle; meta-analysis; questionnaire survey; research work; access to information; article; data analysis; data base; epidemic; information processing; medical research; priority jour Data pooling; Data quality; Data synthesis; Datashaper; Harmonization; Metaanalysis; Retrospective harmonization
dc.titleIs rigorous retrospective harmonization possible? Application of the DataSHaPER approach across 53 Large Studies
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.citationvolume40
dc.date.issued2011
local.identifier.absfor080604 - Database Management
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4468094xPUB299
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationFortier, Isabel, McGill University
local.contributor.affiliationDoiron, Dany, Public Population Project in Genomics
local.contributor.affiliationLittle, Julian, McGill University
local.contributor.affiliationFerretti, Vincent, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research
local.contributor.affiliationL'Heureux, Francois, Public Population Project in Genomics
local.contributor.affiliationStolk, Ronald P, University of Groningen
local.contributor.affiliationKnoppers, Bartha M, McGill University
local.contributor.affiliationHudson, Thomas J, University of Toronto
local.contributor.affiliationBurton, Paul R, University of Leicester
local.contributor.affiliationInternational Harmonization Initiative, -, International Harmonization Initiative
local.contributor.affiliationBanks, Emily, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.bibliographicCitation.issue5
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1314
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage1328
local.identifier.doi10.1093/ije/dyr106
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T11:08:48Z
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-80755168330
local.identifier.thomsonID000296634900023
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Fortier_Is_rigorous_retrospective_2011.pdf211.48 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator