Skip navigation
Skip navigation

When a "father" turns out not to be, does the Act give priority to the (biological) mother? Mulvany v Lane

dc.contributor.authorChisholm, Richard
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T22:23:10Z
dc.identifier.issn0817-623X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/52663
dc.publisherButterworths
dc.sourceAustralian Journal of Family Law
dc.titleWhen a "father" turns out not to be, does the Act give priority to the (biological) mother? Mulvany v Lane
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.citationvolume24
dc.date.issued2010
local.identifier.absfor180113 - Family Law
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4046278xPUB252
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationChisholm, Richard, ANU College of Law, ANU
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage128
dc.date.updated2015-12-09T09:05:19Z
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Chisholm_When_a_"father"_turns_out_not_2010.pdf97.92 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  19 May 2020/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator