Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Reasonable practicability as a requirement: The High Court's decision in MRR v GR

dc.contributor.authorChisholm, Richard
dc.contributor.authorParkinson, Patrick
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T22:22:05Z
dc.identifier.issn0817-623X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/52502
dc.publisherButterworths
dc.sourceAustralian Journal of Family Law
dc.titleReasonable practicability as a requirement: The High Court's decision in MRR v GR
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.citationvolume24
dc.date.issued2010
local.identifier.absfor180113 - Family Law
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4046278xPUB248
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationChisholm, Richard, ANU College of Law, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationParkinson, Patrick, University of Sydney
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage255
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage271
dc.date.updated2015-12-09T09:00:18Z
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Chisholm_Reasonable_practicability_as_a_2010.pdf105.47 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator