Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Feasibility of conducting a randomized control trial for liver cancer screening: Is a randomized controlled trial for liver cancer screening feasible or still needed?

Poustchi, Hossein; Farrell, Geoffrey; Strasser, Simone; Lee, Alice U; McCaughan, Geoffrey W; George, Jacob

Description

Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is commonly practiced and recommended in published guidelines, but evidence for its efficacy has been controversial. We tested the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of HCC surveillance in patients with cirrhosis and followed up those offered screening to detect clinical outcomes. Participation was offered to patients with cirrhosis attending liver clinics at three university hospitals. Following discussion, patients...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorPoustchi, Hossein
dc.contributor.authorFarrell, Geoffrey
dc.contributor.authorStrasser, Simone
dc.contributor.authorLee, Alice U
dc.contributor.authorMcCaughan, Geoffrey W
dc.contributor.authorGeorge, Jacob
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T22:17:04Z
dc.identifier.issn0270-9139
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/51239
dc.description.abstractScreening for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is commonly practiced and recommended in published guidelines, but evidence for its efficacy has been controversial. We tested the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of HCC surveillance in patients with cirrhosis and followed up those offered screening to detect clinical outcomes. Participation was offered to patients with cirrhosis attending liver clinics at three university hospitals. Following discussion, patients received a decision aid (DA) that outlined the risks and benefits of surveillance. The proposed screening program comprised ultrasonography 6-monthly and serum alpha-fetoprotein every 3 months. We envisaged five groups of patients: those who agreed to randomization, those choosing nonrandomized screening, those wanting continuation of usual care, those who were undecided, and those refusing participation. Among 205 patients, 204 (99.5%) declined randomization. Of these, 181 (88%) elected for a nonrandomized screening program, 10% chose usual care (which typically included ad hoc screening), and two were undecided. Among 176 patients fluent in English communication skills, 160 (91%) preferred nonrandomized screening compared with 22/29 (76%) patients needing an interpreter (P < 0.026). Of 173 patients in nonrandomized screening followed up for a mean 13.5 ± 6.04 months, three developed HCC, two died from nonliver-related causes, and one underwent liver transplantation for liver failure. Eighteen of 21 patients in "usual care" received ad hoc screening. A simultaneous survey on the quality of the DA showed that the majority of participants believed that the information provided was unbiased. Conclusion: Although an RCT is theoretically ideal for determining the efficacy, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of HCC screening, informed patients prefer surveillance. A randomized study of HCC screening is not feasible when informed consent is imparted. (HEPATOLOGY 2011;)
dc.publisherW B Saunders Co
dc.sourceHepatology
dc.subjectKeywords: alpha fetoprotein; adult; aged; article; cancer screening; communication skill; echography; feasibility study; female; follow up; human; liver cancer; liver cirrhosis; major clinical study; male; outcome assessment; priority journal; protein blood level;
dc.titleFeasibility of conducting a randomized control trial for liver cancer screening: Is a randomized controlled trial for liver cancer screening feasible or still needed?
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.citationvolume54
dc.date.issued2011
local.identifier.absfor110307 - Gastroenterology and Hepatology
local.identifier.ariespublicationf5625xPUB220
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationPoustchi, Hossein, Tehran University of Medical Science and Westmead Hospital
local.contributor.affiliationFarrell, Geoffrey, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationStrasser, Simone, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
local.contributor.affiliationLee, Alice U, Concord Repatriation General Hospital
local.contributor.affiliationMcCaughan, Geoffrey W, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
local.contributor.affiliationGeorge, Jacob, University of Sydney
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.bibliographicCitation.issue6
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1998
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage2004
local.identifier.doi10.1002/hep.24581
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T08:55:41Z
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-80052949031
local.identifier.thomsonID000297974900012
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Poustchi_Feasibility_of_conducting_a_2011.pdf115 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator