Which worlds are possible? A judgment aggregation problem
Suppose the members of a group (e.g., committee, jury, expert panel) each form a judgment on which worlds in a given set are possible, subject to the constraint that at least one world is possible but not all are. The group seeks to aggregate these individual judgments into a collective judgment, subject to the same constraint. I show that no judgment aggregation rule can solve this problem in accordance with three conditions: "unanimity," "independence" and "non-dictatorship," Although the...[Show more]
|Collections||ANU Research Publications|
|Source:||Journal of Philosophical Logic|
|01_List_Which_worlds_are_possible?_A_2008.pdf||179.32 kB||Adobe PDF||Request a copy|
Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.