One argument that is sometimes made against pursuing radical forms
of human life extension is that such interventions will make the species
less evolvable, which would be morally undesirable. In this article,
I discuss the empirical and evaluative claims of this argument. I argue
that radical increases in life expectancy could, in principle, reduce
the evolutionary potential of human populations through both biological
and cultural mechanisms. I further argue that if life extension
Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.