Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Cotton, health and environment: a case study of self-regulation

CollectionsANU School of Regulation and Global Governance (RegNet)
Title: Cotton, health and environment: a case study of self-regulation
Author(s): Gunningham, Neil
Keywords: Australian cotton industry
occupational health
agricultural chemicals
government regulation
industry self-regulation
VEMAs
Voluntary Environmental Management Arrangements
co-regulation
social license
economic viability
environment
Publisher: Canberra, ACT: The National Research Centre for OHS Regulation (NRCOHSR), Regulatory Institutions Network (RegNet), The Australian National University
Series/Report no.: Working Paper (The Australian National University, National Research Centre for OHS Regulation (NRCOHSR)): No. 29
Description: 
The Australian cotton industry confronts a range of serious occupational health and environmental challenges, many of which relate to the use and misuse of agricultural chemicals. This article asks which policy instruments are likely to be most effective and efficient in addressing those challenges? Is government regulation a credible option or would industry self-regulation achieve better results? Is there a role for safety. Health and environmental management systems or is some other option, or combination of options, likely to achieve better economic and health and environmental outcomes? More broadly, given the substantial threats to the cotton industry's legitimacy (and indirectly to its economic viability) resulting from its tarnished environmental image, how might the industry best preserve its 'social license' and rebuild trust and credibility with key stakeholders? The answers to these questions will have broader resonance than to the cotton industry alone. The industry provides a classic example of the health and environmental challenges that confront high input, intensively irrigated agriculture and other industries that have aroused a high degree of public concern concerning their health and environmental impact. The ways it has reacted to the pressures it faced and sought through voluntary environmental management arrangements (VEMAs), to protect both its 'social license' and its economic viability, contain important lessons for many other industry sectors that will, sooner or later, confront similar health, environmental and economic
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1885/42631
ISSN: 1320-5323

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
CottonHealthEnvironment.NG.pdf403.5 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
2936-~OS.XSH374 BUnknown


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  23 August 2018/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator