Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Short-term experience with responsive regulation in the Australian Taxation Office

dc.contributor.authorJob, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorHonaker, David
dc.contributor.authorAustralian National University. Centre for Tax System Integrity
dc.contributor.authorAustralian Taxation Office
dc.contributor.editorBraithwaite, Valerie
dc.coverage.spatialAustralia
dc.date.accessioned2003-12-15
dc.date.accessioned2004-05-19T15:33:26Z
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-05T08:48:13Z
dc.date.available2004-05-19T15:33:26Z
dc.date.available2011-01-05T08:48:13Z
dc.date.created2002
dc.identifier.isbn0 642 76829 3
dc.identifier.issn1444-8211
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/41393
dc.description.abstractThis paper reports on the perceptions and early experience of staff in the Australian Taxation Office (Tax Office) with responsive regulation. The Tax Office adapted responsive regulation to take the form of the Australian Taxation Office Compliance Model (ATO Compliance Model), which was introduced into the Tax Office in early 1998. Between December 1998 and July 1999, interviews were conducted with operative staff in Tax Office branch offices to determine the extent of staff acceptance and use of the ATO Compliance Model. These interviews examined perceptions of legitimacy of responsive regulation, and barriers to its adoption. Most of those interviewed thought the Compliance Model ‘made sense’. Generally, interviewees saw the Model as legitimate because it encouraged creativity, increased job satisfaction, improved staff communication, and raised awareness of the needs of taxpayers. There were both organisational and individual barriers, which resulted in some resistance to the ATO Compliance Model. However, resistance was more than balanced by enthusiasm. Overall, the changes required within the organisation to adopt responsive regulation were cultural, organisational and personal. Operative staff recognised the need for these changes, looked for intrinsic reward and were keen to acquire the skills needed to regulate responsively. This paper should be read in conjunction with Centre for Tax System Integrity Working Paper No. 28, which reports on interviews with senior Tax Office staff who championed the implementation of the ATO Compliance Model.
dc.format.extent33 pages
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.publisherCentre for Tax System Integrity (CTSI), Research School of Social Sciences, The Australian National University
dc.publisherAustralian Taxation Office
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking paper (Centre for Tax System Integrity) ; no. 30
dc.rightsCentre for Tax System Integrity, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University
dc.rightsCommonwealth of Australia
dc.subjectAustralian Taxation Office
dc.subjectATO
dc.subjectATO Compliance Model
dc.subjectstaff acceptance
dc.subjectbarriers
dc.subjectresponsive regulation
dc.subject.ddc336.200994
dc.subject.lcshTaxation - Australia.
dc.titleShort-term experience with responsive regulation in the Australian Taxation Office
dc.typeWorking/Technical Paper
local.description.refereedno
local.identifier.eprintid2316
local.rights.ispublishedyes
local.identifier.absfor180119 - Law and Society
local.identifier.ariespublicationMigratedxPub4657
local.publisher.urlhttp://regnet.anu.edu.au/
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationCTSI, RSSS
local.contributor.affiliationANU
dc.date.updated2015-12-11T09:06:22Z
local.bibliographicCitation.placeofpublicationCanberra, Australia
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dc.provenancePermission received from RegNet to add their publications to Open Research - ERMS2457502
CollectionsANU Centre for Tax System Integrity (CTSI)

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
WP30.pdf102.99 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  19 May 2020/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator