Exact measures of income in a hyperbolic economy
|Collections||ANU Fenner School of Environment & Society|
|Title:||Exact measures of income in a hyperbolic economy|
|Author(s):||Pezzey, John C. V|
|Publisher:||Canberra, ACT: Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, The Australian National University|
Exact optimal paths are calculated for a closed economy with human made capital, non-renewable resource depletion and exogenous technical progress in production, hyperbolic utility discounting, and (possibly) hyperbolic technical progress. On its optimal path, generally, welfare-equivalent income > wealth equivalent income > Sefton-Weale income > NNP, with possibly dramatic differences among these measures; and sustainable income can be greater, equal or less than NNP. This supports the view that there can be no best, exact definition of income. For low enough discounting, growth is optimal even when technical progress is zero. A particular discount rate makes all income measures and consumption constant and (except NNP) equal; and zero technical progress then gives the Solow (1974) maxim in as a special case. General problems with calculating sustainable income when there is technical progress are discussed, and the optimal path is time-consistent if the discount rate can depend on the economy’s stocks and absolute time.
|een0203.pdf||390.12 kB||Adobe PDF|
Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.