Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Aggregating sets of judgments: an impossibility result

List, Christian; Pettit, Philip

Description

The concern of this paper is the aggregation of sets of rationally connected judgments that the members of a group individually endorse into a corresponding, collectively endorsed set of judgments. After documenting the need for various groups to aggregate judgments, we explain how this task is challenged by the "doctrinal" or "discursive" paradox. We then show that this paradox is not just an artifact of certain specific situations, but that it actually illustrates a new impossibility theorem,...[Show more]

CollectionsANU Research Publications
Date published: 2000
Type: Working/Technical Paper
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1885/40564
http://digitalcollections.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/40564

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
W8.pdf204 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  23 August 2018/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator