Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Regulatory character and regulatory reform: exploring the nexus between globalization and safety standards

Haines, Fiona

Description

Regulatory effectiveness remains a high priority but an elusive goal for many governments. Regulations change, often spurred by developments in other jurisdictions, notably Scandinavia, the EEC or North America, and justified by the epithet ‘best practice’. An underlying assumption of such reform is that ‘best practice’ will provide an optimal outcome irrespective of the particular economic, political and cultural context within which the regulator has to work. Indeed, it is possible to argue...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorHaines, Fiona
dc.date.accessioned2003-06-11
dc.date.accessioned2004-05-19T06:52:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-05T08:24:58Z
dc.date.available2004-05-19T06:52:45Z
dc.date.available2011-01-05T08:24:58Z
dc.date.created2002
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/40251
dc.identifier.urihttp://digitalcollections.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/40251
dc.description.abstractRegulatory effectiveness remains a high priority but an elusive goal for many governments. Regulations change, often spurred by developments in other jurisdictions, notably Scandinavia, the EEC or North America, and justified by the epithet ‘best practice’. An underlying assumption of such reform is that ‘best practice’ will provide an optimal outcome irrespective of the particular economic, political and cultural context within which the regulator has to work. Indeed, it is possible to argue that regulatory scholarship as well as regulation can be seen as part of the range of processes that are defined as ‘globalization’. Scholars such as Nelken (1994) have challenged this assumption in his work comparing of Italian and British regulatory systems, arguing instead for the need to understand regulation as appropriate to cultural context. Scholars working in the Asian context, such as Jayasuriya (2001), are more strident in their criticism. They argue that regulatory reform cannot be effective if it remains at the level of ‘technocratic management’ and does not engage with the economic and political dynamics within the local context. A means of understanding the unique contribution of place in moulding both regulatory reform and its enforcement is sorely needed in order to assess the worth of reforms within a particular context. This paper explores the possibility of regulatory character as a means of understanding the importance of place. Regulatory character extends Selznick’s (1992) concept of organizational character to a regulatory context. Regulatory character involves an understanding of culture, economic and political elements arranged schematically according to the dimensions of authority and social ordering. The paper outlines the construction of the grid and then uses the grid to understand the significance of regulatory reform and regulatory effectiveness in Thailand following the Kader Toy Factory Fire.
dc.format.extent395684 bytes
dc.format.extent360 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/octet-stream
dc.language.isoen_AU
dc.subjectregulatory character
dc.subjectThailand regulatory reform
dc.subjectsafety standards
dc.subjectglobalization
dc.subjectregulatory effectiveness
dc.subjectregulation
dc.subjectregulatory theory
dc.subjectregulatory context
dc.titleRegulatory character and regulatory reform: exploring the nexus between globalization and safety standards
dc.typeWorking/Technical Paper
local.description.refereedno
local.identifier.citationmonthjul
local.identifier.citationyear2002
local.identifier.eprintid1421
local.rights.ispublishedyes
dc.date.issued2002
local.contributor.affiliationNational Research Centre for OHS Regulation
local.contributor.affiliationANU
local.citationWorking Paper no.4
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
working_paper_4.pdf386.41 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator