Unsound Science? Trans-Atlantic Regulatory Disputes over GM Crops
Overall the paper will argue the following: The criteria for evidence depend upon sociocultural values, public protest and institutional responses. Consequently, it is misleading to distinguish between scientific and extra-scientific criteria. As a practical implication, regulatory science cannot readily reconcile or adjudicate conflicts over contentious products in a way which gains public legitimacy. To develop that argument, the paper has the following structure: • analytical perspectives...[Show more]
|Collections||ANU Centre for European Studies (ANUCES)|
|Access Rights:||Open Access|
|les_levidow.pdf||58.35 kB||Adobe PDF|
Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.