In Praise of Manipulation
Many theorists believe that the manipulation of voting procedures is a serious problem.. Accordingly, much of social choice theory examines the conditions under which strategy-proofness can be ensured, and what kind of procedures do a better job of preventing manipulation. This article argues that democrats should not be worried about manipulation. Two arguments against manipulation are examined: first, the 'sincerity argument', according to which manipulation should be rejected because it...[Show more]
|Collections||ANU Research Publications|
|Source:||British Journal of Political Science|
|01_Dowding_In_Praise_of_Manip_2008.pdf||105.08 kB||Adobe PDF||Request a copy|
Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.